Cases 21 - 30 of 43
Velazquez et al v. Sears, Roebuck and Co. et al
as 1:2012cv00294
Plaintiff:
Rosa Velazquez and Israel Velazquez
Defendant:
Sears, Roebuck and Co. , John Doe 1-5 and John Doe 6-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00852
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617
Gannon et al v. Electrolux Professional, Inc. et al
as 5:2011cv00316
Plaintiff:
Keith Gannon and Georgetta Gannon
Defendant:
Electrolux Professional, Inc. , Sears, Roebuck and Co. and Ohio Casualty Insurance Company
Cross_claimant:
Sears, Roebuck and Co.
Cross_defendant:
Electrolux Professional, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv01825
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Terry v. Numark Industries et al
as 5:2011cv00229
Plaintiff:
Anthony Terry
Defendant:
Numark Industries and Sears, Roebuck and Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis v. K-Mart Corporation et al
as 4:2010cv02127
Plaintiff:
Greta G. Davis
Defendant:
K-Mart Corporation and Sears Roebuck and Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Crawther v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.
as 2:2010cv13332
Plaintiff:
Linda Crawther
Defendant:
Sears, Roebuck and Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Massey v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.
as 1:2010cv00059
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Massey
Defendant:
Sears, Roebuck and Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Barnard v. Sears Transition Pay Plan et al
as 2:2010cv11591
Plaintiff:
Hassel Barnard
Defendant:
Sears Transition Pay Plan, Sears Roebuck and Co. and Sears Home Improvement Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1101
Kreis v. Sears Holdings Corporation et al
as 1:2010cv00334
Plaintiff:
Jessica Kreis
Defendant:
Sears Holdings Corporation, Sears Roebuck and Co., KCD IP LLC dba Craftsman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
