Cases 11 - 20 of 76
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00616
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Mithushan v. Barr et al
as 1:2020cv00602
Defendant:
Scott Hassell, Secretary of Homeland Security, Matthew Whitaker and others
Plaintiff:
Pathmakumar Mithushan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Singh v. Barr et al
as 1:2020cv00567
Defendant:
Scott Hassell, Secretary of Homeland Security, Matthew Whitaker and others
Plaintiff:
Surjit Singh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv21005
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Pena Grullon v. Barr et al
as 3:2020cv00312
Defendant:
Simona Flores, William Pelham Barr, Secretary of Homeland Security and others
Plaintiff:
Jose W Pena Grullon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv20649
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Chester et al v. Acting Secretary of Homeland Security et al
as 1:2020cv20365
Plaintiff:
Hazel Duffus Williams, Michael Donnel Chester and Hazel Duffus Chester
Defendant:
Acting Secretary of Homeland Security, Acting Director, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Regional Director, for the Southeast Region, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
STEELE v. ORTIZ et al
as 1:2020cv01153
Respondent:
WARDEN DAVID ORTIZ, SECRETARY OF HOMELAND SECURITY and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
OMAR A. STEELE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00152
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dorival v. Secretary of Homeland Security
as 4:2019cv10210
Defendant:
Secretary of Homeland Security
Plaintiff:
Wilkens Dorival
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
