Cases 51 - 60 of 285
BRETT v. WILLIAMS et al
as 2:2017cv03314
Plaintiff:
FRANK BRETT
Defendant:
SETH WILLIAMS, CAPE REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER "THE BOSS, DAVID SAMSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BUSH v. KENNEY et al
as 2:2017cv03079
Plaintiff:
CLIFTON BUSH
Defendant:
JIM KENNEY and SETH WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PARSONS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2017cv02888
Plaintiff:
RANDALL PARSONS
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, SETH WILLIAMS, CHRISTINA GIARDINA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TOWNS v. DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OF PHILADELPHIA PA UNKOWN et al
as 2:2017cv02866
Plaintiff:
AKENSHAI TOWNS
Defendant:
R. SETH WILLIAMS, CURTIS MATTHEWS, DAVID SOTO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FULLMAN v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2017cv02673
Plaintiff:
ANDREW FULLMAN
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT, PHILADELPHIA DISTRICT ATTORNEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
MITCHELL v. WILLIAMS et al
as 2:2017cv02396
Plaintiff:
MARVIN ANDRE MITCHELL
Defendant:
SETH WILLIAMS, DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE and THE ARRESTING OFFICERS OF THE UNIVERSITY CITY CAMPUS POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GILMORE v. MAHALLY et al
as 2:2017cv02374
Petitioner:
MARVIN GILMORE
Respondent:
MAHALLY, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF SETH WILLIAMS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF _________
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
KENNEDY v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2017cv02338
Plaintiff:
ARDELL KENNEDY
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, JAMES KENNEY, RICHARD ROSS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BETHEA v. WILLIAMS et al
as 2:2017cv02237
Petitioner:
DONALD BETHEA
Respondent:
R. SETH WILLIAMS and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
NASH v. KENNEY et al
as 2:2017cv02111
Plaintiff:
JAMICE NASH
Defendant:
JAMES KENNEY, SETH WILLIAMS, RICHARD ROSS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
