Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Dudley v. Jones (INMATE 3)
as 2:2023cv00746
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Dudley, Jr.
Defendant:
Sgt. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McClure v. Mac Sim Detention Center et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2023cv00702
Plaintiff:
Nathan Warren Fisk McClure
Defendant:
Officer Noland, Officer Williams, Officer Edwards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dees v. Peters et al
as 2:2021cv00371
Defendant:
Steward Shaw, Officer A. Johnson, Officer Terrell and others
Plaintiff:
Clarence Dennis Dees
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mosley v. Cunningham et al
as 2:2021cv00189
Defendant:
Warden Peters, Warden Phyllis Morgan, Sgt Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Fredrick B Mosley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Balcom v. Valenza et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2019cv00132
Defendant:
Lt. Jones, Jason Smoak, Sgt. Peterson and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Devone Balcom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jordan v. Guice, et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2015cv00725
Plaintiff:
Mark Allen Jordan
Defendant:
Officer Guice, Leeposey Daniels, Officer Barber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Greer-El v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2015cv00395
Plaintiff:
Jerome Greer-El
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections , Sgt. Jones , Hunter Futral and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hendrix v. Davenport et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2015cv00247
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Wayne Hendrix
Defendant:
Carter Davenport , Warden Carter , Captain Lawson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hammonds v. Jones et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2015cv00006
Plaintiff:
Mikel Hammonds
Defendant:
Karla Jones, Derrick Carter, Kenneth Sconyers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bladel v. Houston County et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2014cv00118
Plaintiff:
Earnest Edward Bladel
Defendant:
Houston County, Sgt. Turner, Officer De LaPaul and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
