Cases filed in Massachusetts
Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Sharma v. Komatsu et al
as 1:2024cv11446
Plaintiff: Sigfried Sharma
Defendant: Aerwins Technologies, Inc., Shuhei Komatsu, Taiji Ito and others
Pretrial Service: Judge Donald L Cabell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv40058
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Sharma v. Cole We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv12135
Plaintiff: Veena Sharma
Defendant: Stuart Cole formerly doing business as Trustee of County Mortgage Trust and Stuart N. Cole
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 191 Bank Foreclosure
Sharma v. MKS Instruments, Inc.
as 1:2023cv10948
Plaintiff: Rishav Sharma
Defendant: MKS Instruments, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Sharma v. Terranova et al
as 1:2019cv12220
Defendant: Michael B. Feinman, Peter Carusso, Domenic S. Terranova and others
Plaintiff: Veena Sharma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sharma v. Fidelity Investment
as 1:2019cv12186
Plaintiff: Veena Sharma
Defendant: Fidelity Investment
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sharma v. Santander Bank We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv12184
Plaintiff: Veena Sharma
Defendant: Santander Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sharma v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2019cv10992
Plaintiff: Madhu Sharma
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv13263
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 633
Chawla et al v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 1:2013cv11898
Plaintiff: Bhuwan Chawla and Aanchal Sharma
Defendant: United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?