Cases 1 - 10 of 41
Cowan v. State of Montana et al
as 9:2023cv00108
Plaintiff:
Shawn Ryan Cowan
Defendant:
State of Montana, United States of America and ACLU
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CHAND et al v. MTN IRANCELL TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES COMPANY
as 1:2022cv00830
Plaintiff:
SALLY CHAND, MICHAEL CHAND, JR., CHRISTINA MAHON and others
Defendant:
MTN GROUP LIMITED, MTN IRANCELL TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES COMPANY, PHUTHUMA NHLEKO and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2331 Anti-terrorism Act
Shawn Goodfleisch v. USA
as 22-10469
Petitioner / Appellant:
SHAWN RYAN GOODFLEISCH
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
RYAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv56083
Plaintiff:
SHAWN RYAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RYAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv26161
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
SHAWN RYAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cowan v. Langton et al
as 9:2021cv00065
Plaintiff:
Shawn Ryan Cowan
Defendant:
Steve McEwen, Dave Demmons, Jennifer Koiles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RYAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv00276
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
SHAWN RYAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RYAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv96042
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
SHAWN RYAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv04017
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
BROWNE JR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv31199
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
SHAWN RYAN BROWNE JR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
