Cases 1 - 10 of 16
DARDEN v. LAMAS et al
as 2:2022cv04054
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW DARDEN
Defendant:
MARIROSA LAMAS, KENNETH M. EASON, MS. SHIRLEY LAWS-SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DARDEN v. LAMAS et al
as 2:2022cv02140
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW DARDEN
Defendant:
MARIOSA LAMAS, KENNETH M. EASON, MS. SHIRLEY LAWS-SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Allah v. John Thomas, et al
as 20-3539
Defendant / Appellee:
SHIRLEY LAWS-SMITH, JOHN NICHOLSON, PA, DR. KOREN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL MALIK ALLAH
BOYD v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORECTIONS et al
as 2:2020cv03058
Defendant:
JOHN STEINHART, DR. THOMAS LEHMAN, DR. LITTLES and others
Plaintiff:
FRANCIS BOYD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOOKS v. CORRECT CARE SOLUTION et al
as 2:2020cv01116
Defendant:
SAMIRRAH MINNIS, TANISHA DAVIS, MILANO GIANNONE and others
Plaintiff:
OMAR HOOKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JACKSON v. LITTLE et al
as 2:2019cv05824
Respondent:
RN, FORMER CHCA SHIRLEY LAWS-SMITH, PA-C JOHN NICHOLSON, MD BENJAMIN V. ROBINSON and others
Defendant:
SAMIRRAH MINNIS, MANDEE QUINN, MARK WAHL and others
Plaintiff:
TYREEK JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BROWN v. NICHOLSON et al
as 2:2018cv03328
Plaintiff:
MALEEK BROWN
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT MARIROSA LAMAS, PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT JOHN NICHOLSON and RNC SHIRLEY LAW-SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GLENN v. THOMAS et al
as 2:2016cv04153
Plaintiff:
JERRY GLENN
Defendant:
JOHN C. THOMAS, ADRIAN HAREWOOD, SHIFT COMMANDER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Allah v. John Thomas, et al
as 16-3103
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL MALIK ALLAH
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN C. THOMAS, SHIRLEY LAWS-SMITH, LOUISA PEREZ and others
YOUNG v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2015cv06884
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE YOUNG
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, JOHN THOMAS, CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
