Cases 1 - 10 of 42
(PS) Al-Zaghari et al v. State of California et al
as 2:2024cv00283
Plaintiff:
Eva D. Al-Zaghari and Shirley V. Remmert
Defendant:
State of California, Gavin Newsom, Superior Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Al-Zaghari, et al. v. State of California, et al.
as 24-266
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EVA D. AL-ZAGHARI and SHIRLEY V. REMMERT
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, SUSAN JAKUBOWSKI, Judge, QUENTIN KOPP, Judge and others
Remmert et al v. Newsom et al
as 1:2023cv00050
Plaintiff:
Shirley V. Remmert and Eva Al-Zaghari
Defendant:
Gavin Newsom, John Grandsaert, San Mateo County Public Guardian's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Remmert v. SamTrans Company et al
as 3:2022mc80049
Plaintiff:
Shirley V. Remmert
Defendant:
SamTrans Company, Mark R. Forcum and Leland Davis, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Remmert, et al. v. State of California, et al.
as 4:2021mc80141
Plaintiff:
Shirley V. Remmert and Eva D. Al-Zaghari
Defendant:
Governor Gavin Newsome, M.D. Rex Adamson, George A. Miram and others
Shirley Remmert v. USHUD, et al
as 21-15400
Defendant / Appellee:
SAN MATEO COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, TARA E. HEUMANN, Deputy District Attorney and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHIRLEY V. REMMERT
Remmert v. San Mateo County et al
as 3:2021mc80033
Plaintiff:
Shirley V. Remmert
Defendant:
San Mateo County and Sam Trans
Remmert et al v. Stauffer et al
as 4:2019cv05803
Defendant:
Josh Stauffer and Vanessa Osuna
Plaintiff:
Shirley V. Remmert and Eva D. Al-Zaghari
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Remmert v. Hill
as 3:2019cv01927
Petitioner:
Shirley V. Remmert
Respondent:
Molly Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv07560
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
