Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv07487
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02247
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv07705
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Curry, Jr. v. Clark et al
as 2:2022cv00685
Plaintiff:
Raymond Curry, Jr.
Defendant:
Shiseido Americas Corporation, City of Obetz Police Department, Franklin County, Ohio Prosecutor's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Onaka et al v. Shiseido Americas Corporation
as 1:2021cv10665
Plaintiff:
DAIAN ONAKA, TORSHIA WOODS, SHELI ZELLER and others
Defendant:
Shiseido Americas Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Powell v. Shiseido Americas Corporation
as 2:2021cv02295
Plaintiff:
George R Powell
Defendant:
Shiseido Americas Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv06384
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Ferguson v. Shiseido Americas Corporation
as 3:2021cv03181
Plaintiff:
Brittany Ferguson
Defendant:
Shiseido Americas Corporation
Shiseido Americas Corporation v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2021cv03075
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
Plaintiff:
Shiseido Americas Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02093
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
