Cases 1 - 10 of 152
TALBERT v. IRWIN et al
as 2:2024cv00675
Plaintiff:
CHARLES TALBERT
Defendant:
RANDY IRWIN, JOHN BLICHA, IAN GUSTAFSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01714
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
VERGARA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2024cv05555
Defendant:
REGINA INEZ PEOPLES, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MERRICK B. GARLAND and others
Plaintiff:
LUIS EDUARDO VERGARA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al v. BRADLEY et al
as 2:2023cv05044
Petitioner:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Respondent:
AISHA ASHA BRADLEY, HERBERT VINCE RODVILL, MARJORIE P. SIMON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv20889
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
GAIA GARDENS, LLC et al v. TOWNSHIP OF MONTCLAIR
as 2:2023cv20733
Plaintiff:
GAIA GARDENS, LLC, PETER PAUL LANDSCAPERS, LLC, CARUSO PROPERTY SERVICES, LLC and others
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF MONTCLAIR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03249
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
COULL v. ROBERTS et al
as 3:2023cv03657
Plaintiff:
SIMON COULL
Defendant:
JUDGE DANIEL ROBERTS, JUDGE CAROLINE ENRIGHT, JUDGE GARRY ROTHSTADT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
REARDON v. SIMON et al
as 1:2023cv03492
Plaintiff:
JOHN E. REARDON
Defendant:
JOHN/JANE DOE(S), SGT. A. L. SIMON, CHIEF LEASON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SIMON v. ISIDORO et al
as 1:2023cv03204
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY W. SIMON
Defendant:
KRISTA ISIDORO and JUDGE JEAN S. CHETNEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
