Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00330
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Li v. Connecticut et al
as 3:2021cv00996
Plaintiff:
Dongmei Li
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, Dept of Public Health, Dept of Mental Health & Addiction Svcs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00773
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Backmon v. John D'Amelia & Associates LLC et al
as 3:2020cv00006
Defendant:
John D'Amelia & Associates LLC, Housing Authority of the City of Danbury, Pat Kelson Associates, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Carla Backmon and Carla R Backmon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv01547
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Szymonik et al v. Connecticut et al
as 3:2018cv00263
Plaintiff:
Peter T. Szymonik and Monica L. Szymonik
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, Jorge Simon, Leslie Olear and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simons et al v. Sherman et al
as 3:2016cv00488
Plaintiff:
Sam J. Simons and Angela M. Simons
Defendant:
Town of Sherman , First Selectman , Planning & Zoning Comm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blanchfield et al v. Hartford
as 3:2015cv00431
Plaintiff:
Joshua Blanchfield , Simon DeSantis , Kevin Lamkins and others
Defendant:
City of Hartford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Schofield et al v. Manchester et al
as 3:2012cv00544
Plaintiff:
Arthur W. Schofield and Nancy Matthews
Defendant:
Town of Manchester , South Windsor Police Dept , Michael Magrey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
