Cases 41 - 50 of 51
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00058
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Neumann v. Vanderbilt Mortgage and Financial, Inc
as 3:2010cv00015
Plaintiff:
Sharon Sloan Neumann
Defendant:
Vanderbilt Mortgage and Financial, Inc and Vanderbilt Mortgage and Financial, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Stacey v. Sloan et al
as 3:2008cv00794
Respondent:
Sheila M. Sloan, Wilson County Judicial Commissioners, James Randall Hankins and others
Petitioner:
Tony Joe Stacey
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Stacey v. Sloan et al
as 3:2008mc00172
Defendant:
Sheila M. Sloan, Wilson County Judicial Commissioners, James Randall Hankins and others
Plaintiff:
Tony Joe Stacey
Byroads v. Sloan et al
as 3:2008cv00317
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lee Byroads
Defendant:
Charles Edward Sloan and SONY/ATV Publishing
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Stacey v. Broadhead et al
as 3:2007cv01266
Plaintiff:
Tony J. Stacey
Defendant:
Richard Broadhead, (f/n/u) Walls, City of Lebanon Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stacey v. Broadhead et al
as 3:2007mc00195
Plaintiff:
Tony J. Stacey
Defendant:
Richard Broadhead, (f/n/u) Walls, City of Lebanon Police Department and others
Sloan v. J. Hicks Excavating, Inc.
as 3:2007cv00311
Plaintiff:
Melissa Sloan
Defendant:
J. Hicks Excavating, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00148
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Johnson v. Davenport et al
as 3:2007cv00233
Plaintiff:
Walter Clyde Johnson
Defendant:
David Davenport, Scott Ward, Glen Ballinger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
