Cases 81 - 90 of 150
Dittimus v. Sloan
as 1:2012cv02840
Petitioner:
Corri Dittimus
Respondent:
Brigham Sloan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
CCPS Transportation, LLC et al v. Sloan et al
as 2:2012cv02602
Plaintiff:
CCPS Transportation, LLC and Enbridge Pipelines (FSP), LLC
Defendant:
Byron Sloan and Terry Sloan
Counter_claimant:
Terry Sloan and Byron Sloan
Counter_defendant:
CCPS Transportation, LLC and Enbridge Pipelines (FSP), LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Afola v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 1:2012cv02394
Plaintiff:
Lagalia A. Afola and Lagalia (I) A. Afola
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, Brigham Sloan, Brigham (I) Sloan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dittimus v. Sloan
as 1:2012cv02359
Petitioner:
Corri Dittimus
Respondent:
Brigham Sloan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barron v. Bent County Correctional Facility et al
as 1:2012cv02278
Plaintiff:
Jacinto Barron
Defendant:
Bent County Correctional Facility, Brigham Sloan , Jan Bryant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jordan v. Sloan et al
as 1:2012cv01634
Plaintiff:
Aaron Jordan
Defendant:
Christopher Sloan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01126
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 215
Lektron, Inc. v. Sloan Company, Inc., The
as 4:2012cv00203
Plaintiff:
Lektron, Inc.
Defendant:
Sloan Company, Inc., The
Counter_claimant:
Sloan Company, Inc., The
Counter_defendant:
Lektron, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Shock v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2012cv00093
Plaintiff:
Sloan L. Shock
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Allen v. Rodey, Dickason, Sloan, Akin & Robb, P.A. et al
as 1:2012cv00169
Plaintiff:
Donald Allen
Defendant:
Rodey, Dickason, Sloan, Akin & Robb, P.A. and Does 1-25
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
