Cases 41 - 50 of 105
THOMPSON v. FERGUSON et al
as 2:2019cv03455
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP A. THOMPSON
Defendant:
MANDY SIPPLE, C.E.R.T. TEAM, JOHN WETZEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PRATER v. AMERICAN HERITAGE FEDERAL CREDIT UNION et al
as 2:2018cv05515
Defendant:
JANE DOE, MATTHEW JAMES, JOH DOE and others
Plaintiff:
CHARMAINE PRATER
ROBINSON v. PA. DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2018cv05109
Defendant:
PA. DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, SECRETARY JOHN WETZEL and SMART COMMUNICATIONS
Plaintiff:
THOMAS ROBINSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Travillion v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2018cv02075
Plaintiff:
Jamar L. Travillion
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe #4, John/Jane Doe #1, Mr. FNU Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMART et al v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2018cv20029
Defendant:
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP. and MERCK & CO., INC.
Plaintiff:
ELLEN SMART and DARRELL SMART
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMART v. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
as 2:2018cv01654
Plaintiff:
CARLO SMART
Defendant:
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PUGH et al v. FULLER et al
as 2:2018cv00430
Plaintiff:
ANGELA J. PUGH and LARRY W. PUGH
Defendant:
FABIAN FULLER and SMART TECH & UTILITIES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Leshinski v. International Association of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail and Transportation Workers et al
as 3:2018cv00652
Plaintiff:
Paul M. Leshinski
Defendant:
International Association of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail and Transportation Workers , SMART Transportation Division , Sam Nasca and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
ELEV3N, LLC v. VANBEX GROUP, INC.
as 2:2017cv04350
Plaintiff:
ELEV3N, LLC
Defendant:
VANBEX GROUP, INC. , ETHERPARTY INC. and ETHERPARTY SMART CONTRACTS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv01359
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
