Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Pintor v. Borrow Smart Mortgage et al
as 3:2024cv00715
Plaintiff:
Israel McClay Pintor
Defendant:
Borrow Smart Mortgage, United Wholesale Mortage LLC and Fannie Mae
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Thornton v. Smart
as 6:2022cv01811
Plaintiff:
James Thornton
Defendant:
Mat Smart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thornton v. Smart et al
as 6:2021cv01509
Plaintiff:
Brian Thornton
Defendant:
Matt Smart, Tom Beck, Jon Zwemke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Seiko Epson Corporation et al v. OW Supplies Corp. et al
as 3:2017cv00363
Plaintiff:
Epson America, Inc., Epson Portland Inc. and Seiko Epson Corporation
Defendant:
OW Supplies Corp. and Smart and Eazy Corp.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Seiko Epson Corporation et al v. Shoppers Smart LLC et al
as 3:2016cv02324
Plaintiff:
Epson America, Inc., Epson Portland Inc. and Seiko Epson Corporation
Defendant:
Houses Investing of Florida, Corp., Houses Investing, LLLP and Shoppers Smart LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Smart v. Nooth
as 2:2015cv02200
Respondent:
Mark Nooth
Petitioner:
William J. Smart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smart v. Nooth
as 2:2015cv01742
Respondent:
Mark Nooth
Petitioner:
William J. Smart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smart v Southwest Carpenters Pension Plan
as 6:2013cv02002
Plaintiff:
Richard D. Smart
Defendant:
Southwest Carpenters Pension Plan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
United States of America v. Smart Tools LLC et al
as 3:2012cv02006
Defendant:
Kirstin Hegg and Smart Tools LLC
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045 Federal Trade Commission Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01369
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
