Cases 21 - 30 of 390
PUGH v. MISCHLER
as 1:2023cv00735
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW BRYANT PUGH
Defendant:
ANN SMITH MISCHLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MIDDLETON v. PYATTE et al
as 1:2023cv00729
Petitioner:
ROBERT R. MIDDLETON
Respondent:
PAULA K. PYATTE, REBECCA M. EIMERMAN, BRIAN H. WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00700
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12132 Americans with Disabilities Act - Discrimination
SMITH-BEY v. MARION COUNTY COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2023cv00673
Plaintiff:
Beneficial Owner Mykel Smith-Bey and MYKEL SMITH-BEY
Defendant:
MARION COUNTY COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS and MARION COUNTY SHERIFF
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00269
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Pierce v. Zantac Corporation et al
as 2:2023cv00111
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Pierce
Defendant:
Zantac Corporation, Family Dollar, Sanofi and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Wrongful Death
JONES v. GRANT et al
as 1:2023cv00444
Plaintiff:
DAVID MICHAEL JONES
Defendant:
BRANDON GRANT, DARRON GRANGER, DUSTIN ARMSTRONG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00162
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
SMITH v. VANDERBURGH COUNTY et al
as 3:2023cv00011
Plaintiff:
BRANDON SMITH
Defendant:
VANDERBURGH COUNTY, VANDERBURGH COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE and BRENT PERSINGER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00154
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
