Cases 1 - 10 of 316
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00247
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Logan v. Green et al
as 2:2024cv02018
Plaintiff:
Glicenia C. Logan
Defendant:
Vanessa Green, Attorney John Alford, Attorney Matthew R. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Arkansas, State of et al
as 4:2023cv01196
Plaintiff:
Steven R Smith
Defendant:
Arkanas, State of, Pulaski County Arkansas, Does John and Jane 1-20 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Williams v. Pulaski, County of et al
as 4:2023cv01169
Plaintiff:
Khakeem Marquis Williams
Defendant:
Pulaski, County of, Eric Higgins, Mark Swaggerty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Smith v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau et al
as 5:2023cv05223
Plaintiff:
Vanessa Carol Lynn Smith
Defendant:
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and Wealth Management/Arvest
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv05222
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Smith v. Amosi Alltel
as 4:2023cv00853
Plaintiff:
Sheila Smith
Defendant:
Amosi Alltel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Smith v. Amosi Herschend Entertainment
as 4:2023cv00851
Plaintiff:
Sheila Smith
Defendant:
Amosi Herschend Entertainment
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Smith v. Amosi Munn Conversery
as 4:2023cv00850
Plaintiff:
Sheila Smith
Defendant:
Amosi Munn Conversery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Smith v. Hawaii Industry Added Commerce
as 4:2023cv00849
Plaintiff:
Sheila Smith
Defendant:
Hawaii Industry Added Commerce
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
