Cases 1 - 6 of 6
John Hawkins v. South Carolina Commission on Lawyer Conduct
as 22-1632
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN HAWKINS and HAWKLAW PA
Defendant / Appellee:
SOUTH CAROLINA COMMISSION ON LAWYER CONDUCT and SOUTH CAROLINA OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER G. ISGETT, JOHN S NICHOLS and ALAN WILSON, South Carolina Attorney General
Hawkins et al v. South Carolina Commission on Lawyer Conduct, The et al
as 3:2021cv01319
Defendant:
John S Nichols, South Carolina Commission on Lawyer Conduct, The, Alan Wilson and others
Plaintiff:
John Hawkins and HawkLaw PA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Kirkendall Dwyer LLP et al v. South Carolina Commission on Lawyer Conduct, The et al
as 3:2020cv02192
Defendant:
John S Nichols, South Carolina Commission on Lawyer Conduct, The, Alan Wilson and others
Plaintiff:
Kirkendall Dwyer LLP and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Kincannon v. South Carolina Commission on Lawyer Conduct, The et al
as 3:2014cv02832
Plaintiff:
J Todd Kincannon
Defendant:
South Carolina Commission on Lawyer Conduct, The, South Carolina Office of Disciplinary Counsel, The, Lesley Coggiola and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joel Bieber v. South Carolina Commission on L
as 08-2203
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOEL D. BIEBER
Defendant - Appellee:
SOUTH CAROLINA COMMISSION ON LAWYER CONDUCT, SOUTH CAROLINA OFFICE OF THE DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL OF THE SUPREME COURT OF SOUTH CAROLINA, CHRISTOPHER G. ISGETT, in his official capacity and others
Bieber v. South Carolina Commission on Lawyer Conduct et al
as 6:2008cv02215
Plaintiff:
Joel D Bieber and Joel D Bieber
Defendant:
South Carolina Commission on Lawyer Conduct, South Carolina Office of the Disciplinary Counsel of the Supreme Court of South Carolina, Christopher G Isgett and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
