Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Louis Corradi v. New Jersey State Parole Board, et al
as 22-1174
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LOUIS CORRADI
Defendant / Appellee:
NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD, CENTRAL RECEPTION AND ASSIGNMENT FACILITY, MIDDLESEX COUNTY ADULT CORRECTION CENTER and others
Defendant:
P.O. MARQUIS BARRON, P.O. JAMES PERDONI, P.O. JEFFREY SOSNAK and others
Louis Corradi v. New Jersey State Parole Board, et al
as 19-2317
Defendant / Appellee:
DETECTIVE KEVIN LAMONTE, P.O. MICHAEL NUNN, NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LOUIS CORRADI
CORRADI v. NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD et al
as 3:2016cv05076
Plaintiff:
LOUIS CORRADI
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD, CENTRAL RECEPTION AND ASSIGNMENT FACILITY, MIDDLESEX COUNTY ADULT CORRECTION CENTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DIAZ v. BULLOCK et al
as 2:2013cv05192
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY J. DIAZ
Defendant:
M. BULLOCK , P. ARANCIO , KAREN R. COSTANTINO and others
Cross_claimant:
P. ARANCIO and M. BULLOCK
Cross_defendant:
BOROUGH OF SOUTH PLAINFIELD and SOUTH PLAINFIELD POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BUFFALOE et al v. THE CITY OF PLAINFIELD et al
as 2:2012cv03295
Plaintiff:
SHEL S. BUFFALOE , TAURIEN BUFFALOE and LAMAR-RASHAD COOPER
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PLAINFIELD, SHARON ROBINSON-BRIGGS, THE PLAINFIELD POLICE DIVISION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GHWERIEN v. KEARNY POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2011cv01983
Plaintiff:
SHAFI GHWERIEN
Defendant:
KEARNY POLICE DEPARTMENT, NORTH PLAINFIELD POLICE DEPARTMENT, MAHWAH POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ABDEO et al v. BOROUGH OF SOUTH PLAINFIELD POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2007cv04965
Plaintiff:
JAYANT ABDEO and NALINI ABDEO
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF SOUTH PLAINFIELD POLICE DEPARTMENT, M. HOLLAIN, P. WYLAM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
