Cases 1 - 10 of 68
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv02421
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Skaggs v. CURO Financial Technologies Corp.
as 1:2026cv00755
Plaintiff:
Trista Skaggs
Defendant:
CURO Financial Technologies Corp. doing business as Speedy Cash
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Grigsby v. SCIL Texas, LLC
as 6:2025cv00380
Plaintiff:
John Grigsby
Defendant:
SCIL Texas doing business as Speedy Cash
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Terrance Wilson v. Speedy Cash et al
as 5:2025cv01785
Plaintiff:
Terrance Wilson
Defendant:
Speedy Cash and Does 1 through 10, inclusive, and each of them
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2025cv03332
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv04759
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv03992
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Joshua Padilla v. Speedy Cash
as 2:2024cv04959
Plaintiff:
Joshua Padilla
Defendant:
Speedy Cash
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Charman v. California Check Cashing Stores, LLC. et al
as 3:2024cv00695
Plaintiff:
Thane Charman
Defendant:
California Check Cashing Stores, LLC. An California Limited Liability Company doing business as Speedy Cash and Does 1 through 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01952
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
