Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Rose Mechanical Corp. v. Prestige Properties & Development Co. Inc. et al
as 1:2026cv06637
Plaintiff:
Rose Mechanical Corp.
Defendant:
Prestige Properties & Development Co. Inc. and SP Center LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 294 Breach of Contract
Michael Dyer v. Washington SP Warden
as 26-12679
Petitioner:
MICHAEL DAVID DYER
Respondent:
WASHINGTON SP WARDEN
Dennis Riley v. Telfair SP Warden
as 26-12519
Petitioner:
DENNIS RILEY
Respondent:
TELFAIR SP WARDEN
Gregory Lamb v. Commissioner of the Georgia Department of Correcti, et al
as 26-12490
Plaintiff:
GREGORY M. LAMB
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF THE GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GOVERNOR OF GEORGIA, ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF GEORGIA and others
(PC) Der-Boghossian v. State of California et al
as 1:2026cv05453
Plaintiff:
Shant Der-Boghossian
Defendant:
State of California, California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation (CDCR), California Substance Abuse Treatment Facility and State Prison (C-SATF-SP) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Estate of Janet Haworth v. Englewood Health and Rehab et al
as 3:2026cv00230
Plaintiff:
Estate of Janet Haworth
Defendant:
Englewood Health and Rehab, Flyer 4 Operations Holdings, LLC, Englewood Property Landlord, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Stephen Ray, et al v. Georgia Department of Corrections, et al
as 26-12365
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN RAY, MICHAEL DAVID DYER and ROBERT D. KENNEDY
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GEORGIA DIAGNOSTIC AND CLASSIFICATION PRISON and WASHINGTON SP WARDEN
Waseem Daker v. Warden, Hays SP, et al
as 26-12340
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant:
WARDEN, HAYS SP, CHRISTOPHER MCALISTER, GABRIEL ILLA and others
SP Franchising, LLC et al v. 3FM, L.L.C. et al
as 1:2026cv02964
Plaintiff:
SP Franchising, LLC and SP IP, LLC
Defendant:
Alan Ferguson, John Ferguson, Karl Fick and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
