Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Winston v. Spurlock et al
as 3:2024cv00005
Plaintiff:
De'Angelo Don'Virgil Winston
Defendant:
Scott Spurlock, Misty Adkins, Zachery Schelle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spurlock v. Benjamin et al
as 3:2023cv01029
Plaintiff:
Lyman Spurlock
Defendant:
Benjamin, Parole Officer and E Squad Officer
Not Classified By Court:
MIAMI E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01922
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Spurlock v. Revlon, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv09912
Plaintiff:
Artelia Spurlock
Defendant:
Revlon, Inc., Revlon Consumer Products Corporation and Revlon Group Holdings LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hollins v. Neihoff et al
as 3:2022cv01985
Plaintiff:
Derrick Hollins
Defendant:
Officer Neihoff, Mikeal and Warden Spurlock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Spurlock
as 3:2021cv01176
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Pamela D Spurlock and Pamela D. Glenn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Winston v. Acuff et al
as 3:2021cv01134
Plaintiff:
De'Angelo Don'Virgil Winston
Defendant:
Damon Acuff, Randy Kern, Scott Spurlock and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ternaprovich et al v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2020cv01258
Plaintiff:
James Ternaprovich, Mario Reyes, Ronald T Franz and others
Defendant:
Louis Shicker, Illinois Department of Corrections, Wexford Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SPURLOCK v. ZATECKY
as 1:2018cv03366
Petitioner:
COREY L. SPURLOCK
Respondent:
DUSHAN ZATECKY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Spurlock v. Cook County Sheriff's Merit Board et al
as 1:2018cv04484
Plaintiff:
Valerie Spurlock
Defendant:
Cook County Sheriff's Merit Board and Cook County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
