Cases 11 - 20 of 30
St. John v. Au Bon Pain et al
as 1:2017cv02456
Plaintiff:
Lars St. John
Defendant:
Au Bon Pain, Ray Blanchette, Thomas Dolan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Sweeting v. Schweigtzer et al
as 1:2017cv00727
Plaintiff:
Derrick Sweeting
Defendant:
Thomas Schweigtzer, Husbard, Spurlock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spurlock v. Total Homecare Solutions, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv00168
Plaintiff:
Shirley Spurlock and Paige Peters
Defendant:
Total Homecare Solutions, LLC , THS Healthcare Services, Inc. , THS Homechoice, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
T. v. Benton-Carrol-Salem Local School Distict et al
as 3:2016cv02552
Plaintiff:
M. T.
Defendant:
Benton-Carrol-Salem Local School Distict , Russ Exlos-Raber , Guy Parmigian and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Todie v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 4:2016cv00743
Plaintiff:
Eugene A. Todie
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, Nurse Gonzalez, Correctional Officer Stump and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abrams, et al. v. Nucor Steel Marion, Inc.
as 3:2015cv02342
Plaintiff:
Michael F Abrams, Jordan Freeman, Joe Cornelius and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Spurlock v. Commissioner Social Security
as 1:2014cv00990
Plaintiff:
Michael I. Spurlock
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Spurlock v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv02626
Plaintiff:
Wendy Ann Spurlock
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Spurlock v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv02240
Plaintiff:
Debra L. Spurlock
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv01166
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
