Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00439
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Americans with Disabilities Act
Adkins et al v. Spurlock et al
as 3:2021cv00863
Plaintiff:
James L. Adkins, Jr. and Adam Robert Williams
Defendant:
Bill Spurlock and Does 1 - 100
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whipple v. Jessica
as 3:2021cv00208
Defendant:
Laurel County, Edith Hacker, Jamie Mosley and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Z Whipple, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spurlock v. Deshane Holdings, Inc,
as 2:2019cv02651
Defendant:
Deshane Holdings, Inc, d/b/a Resource Management Group, LLC and Deshane Holdings, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Gary Spurlock
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Vickers v. Spurlock
as 2:2015cv02189
Plaintiff:
Sarah Woods Vickers
Defendant:
Mitchell Spurlock
Miscellaneou:
Jimmy Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sanders v. Young et al
as 3:2015cv00098
Plaintiff:
Richard Lee Sanders
Defendant:
Darrell Young, Jane Doe, Randy Nichols and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spurlock et al v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv02572
Plaintiff:
Julia Spurlock and Kenneth Spurlock
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc. and Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc.
Miscellaneou:
Jimmy Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DePinto v. University of Tennessee at Chattanooga et al
as 1:2013cv00160
Plaintiff:
Frank DePinto
Defendant:
University of Tennessee at Chattanooga, Interim Chancellor Grady Bogue, Vice-Chancellor Richard Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv02947
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Ray v. Rogers et al
as 3:2011cv00238
Plaintiff:
Joe Anthony Ray
Defendant:
Joshua Rogers, Williamson County Juvenile Court, Brenda Hyden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
