Cases 1 - 10 of 1,043
Hurtado v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02266
Plaintiff:
Duane Hurtado, Sr.
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hernandez v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02230
Plaintiff:
Elvis Hernandez, Sr.
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rehbein v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02161
Plaintiff:
Thomas Henry Rehbein, Sr.
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Calderone, Sr. v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02030
Plaintiff:
Don Calderone, Sr.
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ballantyne Sr. v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01844
Plaintiff:
James Ballantyne Sr.
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wilkerson v. Phelps-Powers et al
as 3:2024cv00114
Plaintiff:
Patrick Wilkerson, Sr
Defendant:
Melanie Phelps-Powers, Lisa Bruder, Lucas Wilder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00661
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
WOODLEY SR. v. YOUNG et al
as 2:2024cv01619
Petitioner:
Jamal F. Woodley Sr.
Respondent:
David C Young, John R. Cornely, Larry Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lucerini, Sr. v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01493
Plaintiff:
Thomas Lucerini, Sr.
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Johnson v. Manns et al
as 2:2024cv01368
Plaintiff:
Alfred A. Johnson, Sr.
Defendant:
Officer T Manns, Officer Halib Kahn, Annette Chambers-Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
