Cases 41 - 50 of 1,028
Marino v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv05036
Plaintiff:
Jeramie Marino
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Ritchie v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00113
Plaintiff:
Ann Ritchie
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Paget v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03049
Plaintiff:
Devon Elizabeth Paget
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Larsen v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv05035
Plaintiff:
Cheyann Larsen
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Ray Williams v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv02014
Plaintiff:
Ray Williams
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA Martin O'Malley and SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Erevia v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00637
Plaintiff:
Zakkary C. Erevia
Defendant:
Commissioner of SS Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Olsen v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00101
Plaintiff:
Bonnie Olsen
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
v. Williams et al
as 5:2024cv01958
Defendant:
Agnes Williams and Commissioner of SSA Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Valverde v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv01911
Plaintiff:
Eric H. Valverde
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Seipp v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00615
Plaintiff:
Scott Martin Seipp
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
