Cases 1 - 10 of 17
City of St. Clair Shores Police and Fire Retirement System v. Unilever PLC et al
as 1:2022cv05011
Plaintiff:
City of St. Clair Shores Police and Fire Retirement System
Defendant:
Unilever PLC, Alan Jope, Ritva Sotamaa and others
Lead Plaintiff:
Teamsters Local 456 Annuity Fund
Petitioner:
Westchester Teamsters Pension Fund
Davis et al v. Nagel et al
as 1:2021cv04067
Plaintiff:
Stephen L. Davis and City of St. Clair Shores Police and Fire Retirement System
Defendant:
Vernon J. Nagel, Richard K. Reece, Mark A. Black and others
In Re: Grupo Televisa Securiti
as 21-1499
Respondent:
Melvin Gross, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Arrowstreet Capital LP, Grupo Televisa, S.A.B. and others
Petitioner:
Palm Tran, Inc. Amalgamated Transit Union Local 1577 Pension Plan, Individually and on behalf of the certified class, Gilardi & Co., LLC, Colleges of Applied Arts and Technology Pension Plan and others
Amicus Curiae:
Securities and Procedure Scholars, City of Dearborn Heights Police and Fire Retirement System, City of Grand Rapids General Employees Retirement System and others
City of St. Clair Shores Police and Fire Retirement System v. Credit Suisse Group AG et al
as 1:2021cv03385
Defendant:
Thomas Gottstein, David R. Mathers, Credit Suisse Group AG and others
Plaintiff:
City of St. Clair Shores Police and Fire Retirement System
Lead Plaintiff:
The Peace Officers' Annuity and Benefit Fund of Georgia and Sheet Metal Workers Pension Plan of Northern California
Allstate Corporation, et al v. City of St. Clair Shores Polic, et al
as 21-8002
Respondent:
CITY OF ST. CLAIR SHORES POLICE AND FIRE RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated and CITY OF PROVIDENCE
Petitioner:
ALLSTATE CORPORATION, MATTHEW E. WINTER and THOMAS J. WILSON
Allstate Corporation, et al v. City of St. Clair Shores Polic, et al
as 19-8009
Respondent:
CARPENTERS PENSION TRUST FUND FOR NORTHERN CALIFORNIA, CITY OF ST. CLAIR SHORES POLICE AND FIRE RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, CITY OF FORT LAUDERDALE GENERAL EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM and others
Petitioner:
MATTHEW E. WINTER, ALLSTATE CORPORATION and THOMAS J. WILSON
Teimuraz Tsirekidze, et al v. Syntax-Brillian Corporation, et al
as 16-17328
Plaintiff - Appellee:
TEIMURAZ TSIREKIDZE, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, ST. CLAIR SHORES POLICE AND FIRE RETIREMENT SYSTEM, NAGEL FAMILY TRUST and others
Defendant - Appellee:
SYNTAX-BRILLIAN CORPORATION and VINCENT F. SOLLITTO, Jr.
Movant - Appellant:
AHMED AMR
In re the Allstate Corporation Securities Litigation
as 1:2016cv10510
Defendant:
The Allstate Corporation, Thomas J. Wilson, Matthew E. Winter and others
Plaintiff:
City of St. Clair Shores Police and Fire Retirement System and City of Providence
Petitioner:
Carpenters Pension Trust Fund for Northern California, City of Fort Lauderdale General Employees' Retirement System, Carpenters Annuity Trust Fund for Northern California and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
City of St. Clair Shores Police and Fire Retirement System v. Volkswagen AG et al
as 3:2015cv06167
Plaintiff:
City of St. Clair Shores Police and Fire Retirement System
Defendant:
Volkswagen A.G., Volkswagen Group of America Inc, Audi of America and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Steffensen et al v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
as 3:2015cv06026
Plaintiff:
Kirk Steffensen , Susan Tarrence , Terry Hight and others
Defendant:
Volkswagen Group of America Inc and Lynette Brady
Consol_plaintiff:
Peter Brewitt , Amy M. Thomas , Ronald Sekul and others
Consol_defendant:
Volkswagen A.G., Volkswagen Group of America , Audi AG and others
Movant:
Chester County Employees Retirement Fund , Delaware County Employees Retirement System , Charter Township of Clinton Police and Fire Retirement System and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
