Cases 71 - 80 of 381
Benjamin Adams v. Charles Penfold, et al
as 17-3181
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BENJAMIN ADAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES A. PENFOLD, sued in individual capacity, J. PELTIER, sued in individual capacity and STANLEY KNIGHT, sued in official capacity
HOWARD v. KNIGHT et al
as 1:2017cv03325
Defendant:
GULLEDGE, STANLEY KNIGHT, MEAD and others
Plaintiff:
LANCE HOWARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STONE v. KNIGHT et al
as 2:2017cv00429
Defendant:
D. FISH, N. KELLY, STANLEY KNIGHT and others
Plaintiff:
DONALD STONE
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BARNETT v. NEESE et al
as 2:2017cv00387
Plaintiff:
REYMOND BARNETT
Defendant:
ROBERT D. BUGHER, CAMPBELL, R. GAGNON and others
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ADAMS v. PENFOLD et al
as 2:2017cv00368
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN ADAMS
Defendant:
STANLEY KNIGHT, J. PELTIER and C. A. PENFOLD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Byron Brown v. Stanley Knight
as 17-2401
Petitioner - Appellant:
BYRON LAMAR BROWN
Respondent - Appellee:
STANLEY KNIGHT
DIRIG v. KNIGHT et al
as 1:2017cv02195
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER J. DIRIG, SR.
Defendant:
G. EABS, JOHN/JANE DOE(S), KATIE KENNAMEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DIRING v. WEXFORD MEDICAL et al
as 1:2017cv02165
Defendant:
CHASITY, JANE DOES, JOHN DOES and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER J. DIRIG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joshua Black v. Stanley Knight
as 17-2172
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOSHUA BLACK
Respondent - Appellee:
STANLEY KNIGHT
SANDIFAR v. KNIGHT
as 1:2017cv01581
Respondent:
STANLEY KNIGHT
Miscellaneou:
PLAINFIELD CF (Court Use Only)
Petitioner:
TROY A. SANDIFAR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
