Cases 71 - 80 of 118
SINN v. LEMMON et al
as 1:2015cv01394
Defendant:
JOHN BRUSH, HARTZEL, J. HELDERMANN, II and others
Plaintiff:
DYLAN SINN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KINNINGHAM et al v. KNIGHT
as 2:2015cv00144
Defendant:
PENNY ALEE, JASON ENGLISH, ELESHA HILDAGO and others
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER JAMES ANGLEMYER and SHAWN WAYNE KINNINGHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SHARP v. KNIGHT et al
as 2:2015cv00109
Defendant:
DICK BROWN and STANLEY KNIGHT
Plaintiff:
JEREMY SHARP
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCPHERSON v. KNIGHT
as 2:2015cv00013
Respondent:
STANLEY KNIGHT
Petitioner:
NICHOLAS ANTHONY MCPHERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
LOGGING et al v. KNIGHT et al
as 1:2014cv02037
Defendant:
KEVIN KIRKLEN, STANLEY KNIGHT and L.A. VAN NATTA
Plaintiff:
RANDY R. LOGGING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GIBSON v. KUMARAN et al
as 2:2014cv00287
Plaintiff:
JEREMY D. GIBSON
Defendant:
STANLEY KNIGHT and SASHI KUMARAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VANHORN et al v. LEMMON et al
as 2:2014cv00275
Defendant:
ALL MAILROOM EMPLOYEES, HARLEY CRABB, TROY KEITH and others
Plaintiff:
DARNELL CHIVERS and WILLIAM VANHORN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PENDER v. PECKHAM et al
as 1:2014cv01287
Defendant:
JAMES BASINGER, ED BUSS, LESLIE JOHNSON and others
Plaintiff:
SARAH JO PENDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BURTON v. KNIGHT
as 1:2014cv01263
Plaintiff:
GREGORY BURTON
Defendant:
STANLEY KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CARRUTHERS v. CORIZON MEDICAL STAFF et al
as 2:2014cv00217
Defendant:
CONNIE ALLEN, CORIZON INC., CORIZON MEDICAL STAFF and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL CARRUTHERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
