Cases 1 - 10 of 1,864
Harper v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024hc02109
Petitioner:
Terek Harper
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bastas v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024hc02105
Petitioner:
Andreas Peter Bastas
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dennis v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024hc02099
Petitioner:
Antwain Lamar Dennis
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MCGILL v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
as 1:2024cv00447
Petitioner:
MELISSA GRIFFIN MCGILL
Respondent:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Macon v. Morton et al
as 5:2024ct03116
Plaintiff:
Cory Montae Macon
Defendant:
Warden Morton, Michael Russell, State of North Carolina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024hc02092
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
TERRY v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
as 1:2024cv00385
Petitioner:
DOYLE KENT TERRY
Respondent:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hicks v. Kiser et al
as 5:2024cv00225
Plaintiff:
Dennis-DeWayne Hicks
Defendant:
Joshua Kiser, Sean Welhan, North Carolina Highway Patrol and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Drake v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024hc02085
Petitioner:
Omarion Drake
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Tvrdy v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024hc02084
Petitioner:
Jarod Steven Tvrdy
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
