Cases 41 - 50 of 4,021
Crump v. McFarlin
as 3:2024cv00013
Petitioner:
Henry Earl Crump
Respondent:
Warden McFarlin
Not Yet Classified:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
In re: Lewis Ingram
as 24-10717
Petitioner:
In re: LEWIS ALLEN INGRAM
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF GEORGIA
State of West Virginia, et al v. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
as 24-10679
Petitioner:
STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF ALABAMA and others
Respondent:
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Ellington v. Trump et al
as 5:2024cv00261
Plaintiff:
Tiajuawa Tawanna Lavehe Ellington
Defendant:
Donald J Trump, Floyd Money Maywhethers, Rickey Smiley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Edwards v. Bucci et al
as 4:2024cv00061
Defendant:
Noelani G. Skipper, Judge Dean Bucci, Jerald David Westmorland and others
Plaintiff:
Kamiliah Edwards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gray v. Danforth
as 4:2024cv00039
Petitioner:
Ronald B. Gray
Respondent:
Warden Danforth
Not Yet Classified:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
State of Georgia v. Ghani
as 3:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
State of Georgia
Defendant:
Muminah Hakinah Ghani
Jackson v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2024cv00945
Plaintiff:
Everette Jackson, Jr
Defendant:
State of Georgia and Brandy Swanson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crouch v. Jessup
as 2:2024cv00032
Petitioner:
Edward Jasper Crouch
Respondent:
Stephen Jessup
Other:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CARRUTH v. DOE et al
as 1:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
TERRENCE CARRUTH
Defendant:
JOHN OR JANE DOE and STATE OF GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
