Cases 21 - 30 of 40
City of Providence, RI, et al v. Warner Chilcott Company, LLC, et al
as 15-1250
Plaintiff:
PROVIDENCE, RI, individually and on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS LOCAL 1776 & PARTICIPATING EMPLOYERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, NEW YORK HOTEL TRADES COUNCIL AND HOTEL ASSOC. OF NEW YORK CITY, INC. HEALTH BENEFITS FUND, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AMERICAN SALES COMPANY, LLC, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated and ROCHESTER DRUG CO-OPERATIVE, INC., on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
WARNER CHILCOTT COMPANY, LLC, WARNER CHILCOTT PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY, WARNER CHILCOTT HOLDINGS COMPANY, III, LTD. and others
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION et al v. SYSCO CORPORATION et al
as 1:2015cv00256
Defendant:
SYSCO CORPORATION, USF HOLDING CORP. and US FOODS, INC.
Plaintiff:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA and others
Interested Party:
DISTRIBUTION MARKET ADVANTAGE, CHENEY BROTHERS, INC., CULVER FRANCHISING SYSTEM, INC. and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
HPSI PURCHASING SERVICES
Petitioner:
XYZ CORPORATION, FOODBUY, LLC and COMPASS GROUP USA, INC.
Amicus Curiae:
PERFORMANCE FOOD GROUP, INC.
Intervenor:
REINHART FOODSERVICE, L.L.C. and SHAMROCK FOODS COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 53 b Federal Trade Commission Act
Loestrin 24 FE Antitrust Liti, et al, et al
as 14-2071
Plaintiff:
PROVIDENCE, RI, individually and on behalf of itself andall others similarly situated, UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS LOCAL 1776 & PARTICIPATING EMPLOYERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, NEW YORK HOTEL TRADES COUNCIL AND HOTEL ASSOC. OF NEW YORK CITY, INC. HEALTH BENEFITS FUND, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AMERICAN SALES COMPANY, LLC, ROCHESTER DRUG CO-OPERATIVE, INC., on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated and DIRECT PURCHASER CLASS PLAINTIFFS
Defendant - Appellee:
WARNER CHILCOTT COMPANY, LLC, WARNER CHILCOTT PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY, WARNER CHILCOTT HOLDINGS COMPANY, III, LTD. and others
The State of Florida et al v. Service Corporation International et al
as 1:2013cv01082
Defendant:
Service Corporation International and Stewart Enterprises, Inc.
Plaintiff:
The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, The State of Florida, The State of Maryland and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25 Clayton Act
The State of California et al v. Mitsubishi Electric Corporation et al
as 3:2012cv05229
Plaintiff:
The State of California , The State of Arizona , The State of Arkansas and others
Defendant:
Mitsubishi Electric Corporation and Mitsubishi Electric & Electronics USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
The State of California by its Attorney General Kamala D. Harris and the City and County of San Francisco Ex Rel Dennis J. Herrera, The County of Santa Clara, and Los Angeles Unified School District o et al v. Toshiba Corporation et al
as 3:2012cv05230
Plaintiff:
The State of California by its Attorney General Kamala D. Harris and the City and County of San Francisco Ex Rel Dennis J. Herrera, The County of Santa Clara, and Los Angeles Unified School District o , The State of Arizona by its Attorney GeneralTom Horne , The State of Arkansas by its Attorney General Dustin McDaniel and others
Defendant:
Toshiba Corporation and Toshiba America Electronic Components, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
The State of California et al v. Hitachi, Ltd. et al
as 3:2012cv05231
Plaintiff:
The State of California , The State of Arizona , The State of Arkansas and others
Defendant:
Hitachi, Ltd. and Hitachi America, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
The State of Texas et al v. Hachette Book Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv06625
Plaintiff:
The State of Texas , The State of Connecticut , The State of Ohio and others
Defendant:
Hachette Book Group, Inc., Harpercollins Publishers, LLC, Simon & Schuster, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
VIBO Corporation, Inc. v. Jack Conway, et al
as 10-5043
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VIBO CORPORATION, INC., dba General Tobacco
Defendant / Appellee:
JACK CONWAY, in his official capacity as Attorney General, Commonwealth of Kentucky, TROY KING, in his official capacity as Attorney General, State of Alabama, TALIS J. COLBERT, in his official capacity as Attorney General, State of Alaska and others
VIBO Corporation, Inc. v. Jack Conway, et al
as 10-5043
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VIBO CORPORATION, INC., dba General Tobacco
Defendant - Appellee:
JACK CONWAY, in his official capacity as Attorney General, Commonwealth of Kentucky, TROY KING, in his official capacity as Attorney General, State of Alabama, TALIS J. COLBERT, in his official capacity as Attorney General, State of Alaska and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
