Cases 11 - 20 of 74
In Re: Purdue Pharma L.P.
as 22-94
Petitioner:
The Raymond Sackler Family and Raymond Sackler Family/Side B of the Sackler Family
Respondent:
The State of Washington, State of Maryland, District of Columbia and others
In Re: Purdue Pharma L.P.
as 22-88
Petitioner:
Multi-State Governmental Entities Group
Respondent:
State of California, State of Connecticut, State of Delaware and others
United States of America, ex r v. Amgen Inc.
as 22-18
Plaintiff:
United States of America, Ex Rel. Joseph Piacentile and Kevin B. Kilcoyne, State of California, State of Delaware and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
Joseph Piacentile and Kevin Kilcoyne
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. Oncology, Inc.
Defendant:
Amgen, Inc., Amerisource Bergen Corp., Amerisource Bergen Specialty Group, Inc. and others
Soule v. Connecticut Association of Sch
as 21-1365
Defendant / Appellee:
Danbury Public Schools Board of Education, Glastonbury Public Schools Board of Education, Commission on Human Rights and Opportunities and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Chelsea Mitchell, a minor, by Christina Mitchell, her mother, Alanna Smith, a minor, by Cheryl Radachowsky, her mother, Ashley Nicoletti, a minor, by Jennifer Nicoletti, her mother and others
Petitioner:
Business Executives
Amicus Curiae:
American Academy of Pediatrics, Hezekiah Beardsley Connecticut Chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics, New York State American Academy of Pediatrics and others
State of New York v. National Highway Traffic Safte
as 21-339
Petitioner:
State of Delaware, State of Maine, State of Rhode Island and others
Respondent:
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Pete Buttigieg, in his capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Transportation and Dr. Steven Cliff, in his capacity as the Deputy Administrator of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
The Employee Retirement System of the City of Providence v. Corbat et al
as 1:2020cv09937
Defendant:
Alexander Wynaendts, James S. Turley, Grace E. Dailey and others
Plaintiff:
The Employee Retirement System of the City of Providence
Nominal Defendant:
Citigroup Inc.
Lead Plaintiff:
Employees' Retirement System of The State of Rhode Island
Asbestos Workers Philadelphia Welfare and Pension Fund v. Corbat et al
as 1:2020cv09977
Defendant:
Alexander Wynaendts, James S. Turley, Grace E. Dailey and others
Nominal Defendant:
Citigroup Inc.,
Plaintiff:
Asbestos Workers Philadelphia Welfare and Pension Fund
Lead Plaintiff:
Employees' Retirement System of The State of Rhode Island and The Employee Retirement System of the City of Providence
In Re: Citigroup Inc. Shareholder Derivative Litigation
as 1:2020cv09438
Defendant:
Alexander Wynaendts, James S. Turley, Grace E. Dailey and others
Plaintiff:
Employees' Retirement System of The State of Rhode Island, Dean Andersen and Asbestos Workers Philadelphia Welfare and Pension Fund
Nominal Defendant:
Citigroup Inc.
Interested Party:
Westchester Putnam Counties Heavy & Highway Laborers Local 60 Benefit Funds and Police & Fire Retirement System of the City of Detroit
Lead Plaintiff:
The Employee Retirement System of the City of Providence
State of New York v. Scalia
as 20-3806
Plaintiff / Appellee:
State of Colorado, State of Illinois, State of New York and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Eugene Scalia, Esq., Secretary of the United States Department of Labor, United States Department of Labor and United States of America
Intervenor:
American Lodging and Hotel Association, HR Policy Association, Associated Builders and Contractors and others
State of New York v. Scalia
as 20-3815
Plaintiff / Appellee:
State of Colorado, Stete of Michigan, State of Illinois and others
Defendant:
United States of America, Eugene Scalia, Esq., Secretary of the United States Department of Labor and United States Department of Labor
Intervenor:
American Lodging and Hotel Association, Associated Builders and Contractors, The Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
