Cases 1 - 10 of 88
Afshar Shandiz v. State of Texas et al
as 1:2024cv03237
Plaintiff:
Ali Afshar Shandiz
Defendant:
State of Texas and Officer Fusilier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ifeji et al v. garland et al
as 1:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
Jazzlyn Shabera Ifeji, Jazzlyn Shabera Ifeji Estate et al., Joseph Eddie Pryor Estate et al. and others
Defendant:
merrick garland attorney general et al., United States Department of Justice HEIRS AND ASSIGNS doing business as MERRICK GARLAND, andrew saul commissioner et al., Social Security Administration HEIRS AND ASSIGNS doing business as ANDREW SAUL, janet louise yellen secretary of the treasury et al., United States Department of the Treasury HEIRS AND ASSIGNS doing business as JANET LOUISE YELLEN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Biggers v. The State of Texas
as 23-7784
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TRENESHA BIGGERS
Plaintiff:
M.F., A minor and Z.S., A minor
Defendant / Appellee:
THE STATE OF TEXAS, NEW YORK ACS, EL PASO CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES and others
United States of America v. U.S. Oncology, Inc.
as 23-1334
Plaintiff:
United States of America, ex rel. Omni Healthcare, State of California, ex rel. Omni Healthcare, State of Colorado, ex rel. Omni Healthcare and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Omni Healthcare Inc.
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. Oncology, Inc.
In re: Google Digital Advertising Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2021md03010
Plaintiff:
Associated Newspapers Ltd., Mail Media, Inc., Emmerich Newspapers, Incorporated and others
Defendant:
Google LLC, Alphabet Inc., Facebook Inc. and others
Interpleader:
State of Louisiana and State of South Carolina
Interested Party:
The Nation Company, L.P., Genius Media Group, Inc., Mikula Web Solutions, Inc. and others
Amicus Curiae:
Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press and 23 Media Organizations
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
United States of America v. Pharmerica Corporation
as 23-909
Plaintiff:
ABC, United States of America, The State of Alaska and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ex rel. Kaveh Askari
Defendant / Appellee:
PharMerica Corporation, Pharmacy Corporation of America, Oncomed Specialty Pharmacy, LTD., DBA Onco360 and others
Defendant:
DEF, David Froessel, Jeff Kimmel and others
United States of America, ex rel Don Hanks v. Amgen Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv03096
Plaintiff:
United States of America, ex rel Don Hanks, State of California ex rel. Don Hanks, State of Delaware ex rel. Don Hanks and others
Defendant:
Amgen Inc., Florida Cancer Specialist, Gulfcoast Oncology Associates and others
Interested Party:
21st Century Oncology of Jacksonville, LLC
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
In re: Google LLC
as 23-910
Petitioner:
Google, LLC
Respondent:
The State of Texas, State of Alaska, State of Arkansas and others
Hulinsky v. County of Westchester County Department of Public
as 23-804
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe and Sally Roe
Plaintiff / Appellant:
40 Days for Life, a nonprofit corporation of the State of Texas, White Plains 40 Days for Life, as unincorporated association of the State of New York, Oksana Hulinsky and others
Defendant / Appellee:
County of Westchester
Defendant:
County of Westchester County Department of Public Safety, Terrance Raynor, Acting Commissioner of the Westchester Department of Public Safety, in his official capacity, New Rochelle Police Department and others
United States of America v. McKesson Corporation
as 23-726
Plaintiff:
ABC, United States of America, ex rel, State of California, ex rel and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Adam Hart
Defendant / Appellee:
McKesson Corporation, McKesson Specialty Distribution LLC, Collectively and McKesson Specialty Care Distrobution Corportaion, Collectively, DBA McKesson Specialty Health
Defendant:
DEF and McKesson Specialty Care Distribution JV LLC, FKA McKesson Specialty Care Distribution Joint Venture LP
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
