Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Velayas v. State of Maryland et al
as 1:2023cv00493
Plaintiff:
Kelly Michael Velayas
Defendant:
State of Maryland, State of Virginia, State of West Virginia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Parham et al v. Watson et al
as 3:2020cv00572
Defendant:
Lynn Fitch and Michael D. Watson, Jr.
Plaintiff:
Jed Oppenheim, Mississippi State Conference of the N.A.A.C.P., League of Women Voters Mississippi and others
Amicus Curiae:
The State of California, The State of New York, The State of Rhode Island and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson Women's Hlth Org v. Dobbs
as 19-60455
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JACKSON WOMEN'S HEALTH ORGANIZATION, on behalf of itself and its patients and SACHEEN CARR-ELLIS, M.D., M.P.H., on behalf of herself and her patients
Defendant / Appellant:
KENNETH CLEVELAND, M.D., in his official capacity as Executive Director of the Mississippi State Board of Medical Licensure and THOMAS E. DOBBS, M.D., M.P.H., in his official capacity as State Health Officer of the Mississippi Department of Health
Amicus Curiae:
Roman Catholic Diocese of Jackson, Mississippi, Roman Catholic Diocese of Biloxi, Mississippi, Information Society Project at Yale Law School and others
Kennedy v. The State of Alabama et al
as 5:2016cv01116
Defendant:
Democratic National Party, Republican National Party, State of Connecticut and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Kennedy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stroman Realty Inc v. Davi, et al
as 05-20803
Plaintiff - Appellee:
STROMAN REALTY INC
Defendant - Appellant:
RICHARD T FARRELL, Secretary of Department of Business and Professional Regulations for the State of Florida and SIMONE MARSTILLER, Secretary of the Department of Business and Professional Regulations for the State of Florida
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF ILLINOIS, STATE OF ALASKA, STATE OF ARIZONA and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
