Cases 1 - 10 of 439
Mills v. Precythe et al
as 4:2024cv00680
Plaintiff:
Desmond Arnez Mills
Defendant:
Anne L. Precythe, Richard Adams, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bedwell v. The Maples Health and Rehabilitation, LLC
as 4:2024cv00621
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Bedwell
Defendant:
The Maples Health and Rehabilitation, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00305
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Doss et al v. AT&T Inc.
as 4:2024cv00234
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Doss, Bethany Miller and Aimee Jarvis
Defendant:
AT&T Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Nash et al v. DAS Acquisition Company, LLC
as 4:2024cv00473
Plaintiff:
Roderick Nash, Teresa Hill and Stephanie Turner
Defendant:
DAS Acquisition Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Williams v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
Kristine Williams
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Corrections, Bill Stange, Billy Loflin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chavis v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv05016
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Mae Chavis
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Gipson v. Powers et al
as 3:2024cv05011
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Gipson
Defendant:
Stephanie Powers and American Media Investments, Inc. doing business as KKOW Radio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Otte v. Wilson et al
as 2:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
Shawn Otte
Defendant:
Arron Wilson, Chandra Bankhead, Mike Fusselman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Otte v. Fussleman et al
as 2:2024cv00009
Plaintiff:
Shawn Otte
Defendant:
Mike Fussleman, Jessica Tagg, Aleix Fry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
