Cases 1 - 10 of 30
DOMINY v. EVANS et al
as 2:2026cv00308
Plaintiff:
BRIAN MICHAEL DOMINY
Defendant:
MARK DISALESANDRO, STEPHEN BUZAS and R. EVANS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIS v. BUZAS et al
as 2:2025cv00612
Plaintiff:
RAHEEM WILLIS
Defendant:
STEPHEN BUZAS, DR. CHANG, A. MILLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Isaac Naranjo v. George Little, et al
as 25-1733
Plaintiff:
ISAAC NARANJO
Defendant:
GEORGE M. LITTLE, TABB BICKELL, STEPHEN BUZAS and others
HAMMOND v. THOMAS et al
as 2:2024cv01535
Defendant:
CORRECTIONS OFFICER THOMAS, CORRECTIONS OFFICER PHILLIPS, SUPERINTENDENT MICHAEL ZAKEN and others
Plaintiff:
KHALIL HAMMOND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
ROSARIO v. ZAKEN et al
as 2:2024cv01387
Defendant:
COUNSELOR ERIC HURD, SERGEANT WRIGHT, LIEUTENANT YAUGER and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID ROSARIO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
GIDDINGS v. HARRY et al
as 2:2024cv00922
Defendant:
MICHAEL ZAKEN, LAUREL HARRY, TAMMY FERGERSON and others
Plaintiff:
LEVI GIDDINGS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
LEE v. HARRY et al
as 2:2024cv00126
Plaintiff:
GREGORY LEE
Defendant:
LAUREL HARRY, GEORGE LITTLE, TODD BICKLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
PIERRE v. GREENAWALT et al
as 2:2023cv02036
Plaintiff:
MARCARTON N. PIERRE
Defendant:
C. GREENAWALT, WARDEN MICHAEL ZAKEN, SGT. GEORGE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
NARANJO v. COULEHAN et al
as 2:2023cv01983
Plaintiff:
ISAAC NARANJO
Defendant:
UNIT MANAGER COULEHAN, HURD, WITTMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. HENRY et al
as 2:2023cv01686
Plaintiff:
AKIL ASIM JOHNSON
Defendant:
MICHELLE HENRY, MICHAEL ZAKEN, STEPHEN BUZAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
