Cases 41 - 50 of 78
Brimmer v. Dotson
as 2:2009cv01222
Petitioner:
LeRoy Brimmer
Respondent:
Stephen Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Umar Muhammad v. Melody Turner, et al
as 09-6182
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UMAR S. MUHAMMAD, aka Jimmy Green
Defendant - Appellee:
MELODY TURNER, Warden, STEPHEN DOTSON, GRADY PERRY and others
Harrington vs. Tennessee Department of Correction, et al
as 1:2009cv01161
Plaintiff:
Anthony Harrington
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Correction, George M. Little, Corrections Corporation of America and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Parker et al
as 1:2009cv00192
Plaintiff:
Charles A. Clark
Defendant:
Tony Parker, (f/n/u) Williams, Samantha Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Clark v. Parker et al
as 1:2009cv01152
Plaintiff:
Charles A. Clark
Defendant:
Stephen Dotson, Stephen Dotson, Lyle Reece-Gardner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Dotson et al
as 1:2009cv01124
Plaintiff:
Verdell Lyn Williams, Jr.
Defendant:
Stephen Dotson, Trinity Polk, Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradford v. Dotson
as 1:2009cv01135
Petitioner:
Ronnie Bradford
Respondent:
Stephen Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burl v. Dotson et al
as 1:2009cv01086
Plaintiff:
Miko T. Burl
Defendant:
Stephen Dotson, Grady Perry, Tammy Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Umar Muhammad v. Melody Turner, et al
as 08-6517
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UMAR S. MUHAMMAD, aka Jimmy Green
Defendant - Appellee:
MELODY TURNER, Warden, STEPHEN DOTSON, GRADY PERRY and others
Maclin v. Dotson
as 1:2008cv01297
Petitioner:
Lonnie Maclin
Respondent:
Stephen Dotson
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
