Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Deyoe Harris v. Sidney Thomas, et al
as 23-15995
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEYOE R. HARRIS
Defendant / Appellee:
SIDNEY R. THOMAS, Frm 9th Circuit Chief Judge, MARGARET G. MCKEOWN, U.S. 9th Circuit Senior Judge, BAIRD STEPHEN GREENE, Tucson City Attorney and others
Harris v. Thomas et al
as 4:2023cv00072
Plaintiff:
Deyoe Royal Harris
Defendant:
Sidney R Thomas, Michael D Hawkins, Margaret G McKeown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00068
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv01668
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv01477
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv01471
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv01362
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv01223
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Kesrawani v. Chertoff et al
as 2:2007cv01176
Plaintiff:
Jose Kesrawani
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Emilio T. Gonzales, Lola Parocua and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv00481
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
