Cases 1 - 10 of 54
Davis, Stephen v. Kallas, Kevin et al
as 3:2026cv00537
Plaintiff:
Stephen Matthew Davis
Defendant:
Kevin Kallas, Greg Van Rybroek, Dawn Schott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis v. Smith et al
as 2:2026cv00936
Plaintiff:
Stephen Matthew Davis
Respondent:
Scott Smith and John and Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kotevski (PS) v. Du et al
as 1:2026cv02146
Defendant:
Lilly Winschester, Hamad bin Jassim bin Jaber bin Mohammed bin Thani Al Thani, Miranda Du and others
Plaintiff:
Milan Michael Kotevski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Aguilar et al v. Space Exploration Technologies Corporation
as 1:2026cv00485
Plaintiff:
Jazmin Aguilar, Blanca Aguirre, Fernando Aguirre and others
Defendant:
Space Exploration Technologies Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ruzbacki v. BUTLER COUNTY et al
as 2:2026cv00532
Defendant:
BUTLER COUNTY, MICHAEL SLUPE and JULIE GRAHAM
Plaintiff:
Stephen Matthew Ruzbacki
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-1567
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Davis, Stephen v. Laetsch, Kevin et al
as 3:2026cv00183
Plaintiff:
Stephen Matthew Davis
Defendant:
Kevin Laetsch, Javon Alyasiri, Greg Van Rybroek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
In re: Marquez
as 26-2003
Petitioner:
ANTOINETTE MARQUEZ
Respondent:
AMBER BAKER-CHAVEZ, HEIDI MONGE, ELIZABETH O'ROURKE and others
Kotevski v. Bush et al
as 2:2025cv02212
Plaintiff:
Milan Michael Kotevski and Miki Kotevski
Defendant:
George W. Bush, Hillary Rodman Clinton, William Jefferson Clinton and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Marquez v. Baker-Chavez, et al
as 25-2082
Plaintiff:
ANTOINETTE MARQUEZ
Defendant:
AMBER BAKER-CHAVEZ, ELIZABETH O'ROURKE, GERARD LAVELLE, Judge and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
