Cases 1 - 10 of 706
YANG v. JOURNALISTIC, INC.
as 1:2024cv00405
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN YANG
Defendant:
JOURNALISTIC, INC.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Rouse v. Godfrey et al
as 5:2024ct03115
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lindell Rouse
Defendant:
John Godfrey, Marshall Pike, Cathy Judge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rutledge et al v. Wake Forest University School of Medicine et al
as 3:2024cv00404
Defendant:
William Richardson, Juilene Almond, Wake Forest University School of Medicine and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher R. Rutledge, A M R and A D R
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cormier v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00289
Plaintiff:
Gary Stephen Cormier
Defendant:
United States of America
Cannon v. Bullard
as 5:2024hc02053
Petitioner:
Stephen Michael Cannon
Respondent:
Jamie Bullard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Oberheim v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00144
Plaintiff:
Stephen Oberheim
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
SMALL v. USA
as 1:2024cv00169
Petitioner:
STEPHEN ALLEN SMALL, JR.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
TISDALE v. WEAVIL et al
as 1:2024cv00166
Plaintiff:
IVORY JOE TISDALE
Defendant:
T.A. WEAVIL, DANNY ROGERS, VERONICA L. EDMINSTEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOOVER v. WADDELL et al
as 1:2024cv00126
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY LEON HOOVER
Defendant:
STEPHEN WADDELL, ROY A. COOPER III, ELIZABETH N. STRICKLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Larkin v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00061
Plaintiff:
Stephen J. Larkin
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
