Cases 11 - 20 of 204
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01343
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
BARLOW v. BOBITT et al
as 7:2022cv00027
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA ARLINGTON BARLOW
Defendant:
Warden BOBITT, Ms SHARPE, Mr SPIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00301
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv04745
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
J.H. Parker Co., Inc. et al v. United States et al
as 2:2021cv00082
Plaintiff:
J.H. Parker Co., Inc., Parker's Surrency #208, Parker's Sterling and others
Defendant:
United States and United States Department of Agriculture
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Sterling v. Perry
as 3:2021cv00145
Petitioner:
Coranzo Lopez Sterling
Respondent:
Warden Perry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv03490
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Moya v. Jackson et al
as 1:2021cv03481
Plaintiff:
Mario Moya
Defendant:
Officer Sterling Jackson and City of Chamblee, Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Atlanta Plumbers and Steamfitters Health and Welfare Fund et al v. Metropolitan Mechanical, Inc.
as 1:2021cv03263
Plaintiff:
Atlanta Plumbers and Steamfitters Health and Welfare Fund, Atlanta Plumbers and Steamfitters Retiree Health and Welfare Fund, Atlanta Plumbers and Steamfitters Pension Fund and others
Defendant:
Metropolitan Mechanical, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Sterling v. Kennedy
as 1:2021cv02535
Respondent:
Lieutenant Kennedy
Petitioner:
Coranzo Sterling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
