Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Alli v. Sterling et al
as 1:2024cv02734
Plaintiff:
Umar Alli
Defendant:
Sterling, Edmund, Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sterling v. Howard
as 1:2022cv04344
Petitioner:
Ishmael Sterling
Respondent:
David Howard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stevens v. Cuomo et al
as 9:2021cv00306
Defendant:
Anthony J. Annucci, Andrew Cuomo, T. Harrigan and others
Plaintiff:
Sterling Stevens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sterling v. The State of New York et al
as 1:2020cv10804
Defendant:
The State of New York, New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision and Fishkill Correctional Facility
Plaintiff:
Brandon Sterling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sterling v. United States of America
as 1:2020cv10754
Plaintiff:
Kevin Sterling
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Sterling v. United States of America
as 1:2020cv06411
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Leonard Sterling
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Stevens v. Bell et al
as 9:2020cv00853
Defendant:
C. Delutis, Sergeant Duquette, Earl Bell and others
Plaintiff:
Sterling Stevens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sterling v. Royce
as 1:2020cv00283
Respondent:
Mark Royce
Petitioner:
George Sterling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lewis v. Housing and Urban Development (HUD) et al
as 1:2015cv06261
Plaintiff:
Regina Lewis
Defendant:
Housing and Urban Development (HUD), Newburgh Housing Authority, Florence Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Corley v. Vance et al
as 1:2015cv01800
Plaintiff:
Royce Corley
Defendant:
Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., David Stuart, John Temples and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
