Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Steve Ballard et al v. The San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department et al
as 8:2013cv00908
Plaintiff:
Steve Ballard and Catherine Olsen
Defendant:
George Bloomfield, Does, Bary L Schlieder and others
Joseph Wilkins v. Jill Wahl, et al
as 13-1666
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH LEWIS WILKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
JILL WAHL, Doctor, TINA JEPSEN, Health Care Administrator, DIANNA BARKLEY, also known as DIANNA DOE and others
Hegwood v. Chandler et al.
as 3:2013cv50031
Plaintiff:
Talmon Hegwood, Jr.
Defendant:
Nedra Chandler, Illinois Department Of Corrections, Travis Handke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Steve Ballard v. Bank of America, NA et al
as 8:2012cv01698
Plaintiff:
Steve Ballard
Defendant:
Bank of America, NA, Does, Reconstrust Company, NA and others
Cold Stone Creamery, Inc. v. Ballard et al
as 1:2012cv00289
Plaintiff:
Cold Stone Creamery, Inc. and Cold Stone Creamery Leasing Company, Inc.
Defendant:
Kevin Ballard, Bianca Ballard, Scott Ballard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wilkins v. Ballard et al
as 3:2011cv50281
Plaintiff:
Joseph Lewis Wilkins
Defendant:
Steve Ballard, Doe, Chandler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilkins v. Psychatrist-NRC Stateville C.C. et al
as 3:2011cv50180
Plaintiff:
Joseph Wilkins
Defendant:
Psychatrist-NRC Stateville C.C., Intake Nurse-NRC Stateville, J. O'brien and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peters v. Ballard
as 1:2011cv02638
Petitioner:
Antoine Peters
Respondent:
Steve Ballard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wilkins v. Wahl et al
as 4:2011cv04003
Plaintiff:
Joseph Lewis Wilkins
Defendant:
. Wahl, Steve Ballard, Tina Jepsen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peters v. Clark et al
as 4:2010cv04070
Plaintiff:
Antoine Peters
Defendant:
Carl Clark, Ryan Rivera, Martin Hull and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
