Cases 1 - 10 of 834
Building Trades United Pension Trust Fund et al v. STEVEN C HESSIL d/b/a DR PLUMBER LLC
as 2:2024cv00762
Plaintiff:
Building Trades United Pension Trust Fund and William Bonlender
Defendant:
STEVEN C HESSIL d/b/a DR PLUMBER LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Holmes v. Johnson
as 2:2024cv00752
Petitioner:
Leonard T Holmes
Respondent:
Warden Steven R Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Commo v. Capital Express, LLC
as 2:2024cv00751
Plaintiff:
Steven Commo
Defendant:
Capital Express, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Vega v. Cushing et al
as 2:2024cv00749
Plaintiff:
Alfredo Vega
Defendant:
Capt Daniel Cushing, Capt Michael Cole, Lt Anthony Matushak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill et al v. Young et al
as 2:2024cv00737
Plaintiff:
Tameca Hill
Defendant:
Brian Young, Richard Tolentino, Alexander Verreault and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Huffer v. Kosicek et al
as 2:2024cv00729
Plaintiff:
Steven M Huffer
Defendant:
Carmen Kosicek, Mary Ann Huffer, Texoma Medical Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Girtler v. Stevens
as 2:2024cv00727
Petitioner:
Mark Anthony Girtler
Respondent:
C Stevens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harper v. Stevens et al
as 2:2024cv00694
Plaintiff:
Kevin O Harper
Defendant:
Christopher Stevens, John Kind, Dylon Radtke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Knickerbocker v. State of Wisconsin
as 2:2024cv00652
Plaintiff:
Steven G Knickerbocker
Defendant:
State of Wisconsin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mazzucco v. Johnson
as 2:2024cv00654
Petitioner:
Dominic Gabriel Mazzucco
Respondent:
Warden Steven R Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
