Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Dyson v. Lane et al
as 1:2024cv00944
Plaintiff:
Stefannie Dyson
Defendant:
Jordan Lane, Jasmine Jermaine Hall, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
C.S., by and through his natural mother and guardian, Deanna Stott, and Deanna Stott, individually v. Mead Johnson & Company, LLC
as 1:2024cv00361
Plaintiff:
C.S., by and through his natural mother and guardian, Deanna Stott, and Deanna Stott, individually
Defendant:
MEAD JOHNSON & COMPANY, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Flowers v. Lt. Galan et al
as 1:2023cv01237
Plaintiff:
Frederick Michael Flowers
Defendant:
Lt. Galan, Ms. Hill, Ms. Stott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv03275
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Stott v. Menard's #3071
as 1:2016cv11037
Defendant:
Menard's #3071
Plaintiff:
Daniel Stott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Stott v. Colvin
as 3:2016cv50280
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Plaintiff:
Maythy R. Stott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Stott v. Airsped, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv04058
Plaintiff:
Brian Stott
Defendant:
Airsped, Inc. and Keith Ahrling
Counter_claimant:
Keith Ahrling
Counter_defendant:
Brian Stott
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Nationwide Freight System, Inc. et al v. Illinois Commerce Commission et al
as 1:2012cv02486
Plaintiff:
Nationwide Freight System, Inc. , Leader U.S. Messenger, Inc. and Stott Contracting, LLC
Defendant:
Illinois Commerce Commission , Thomas Baudino , Odie Carpenter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Young v. Stotts et al
as 1:2008cv06076
Plaintiff:
Rosetta Young and Rosetta Young
Defendant:
T. L. Stotts, K E Kusinski, K. Herrera and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
