Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Mondor v. Schnell et al
as 0:2023cv02511
Plaintiff:
David Mondor
Defendant:
Paul Schnell, Michelle Smith, Guy Bosch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Strobel v. Titus
as 0:2019cv00583
Respondent:
Jeff Titus
Petitioner:
Donald Albert Strobel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Strobel v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
as 0:2017cv02339
Plaintiff:
Kristann B. Strobel
Defendant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Strobel v. Ramsey County et al
as 0:2013cv00777
Defendant:
Ramsey County and John Doe 1
Plaintiff:
Charles S. Strobel
1-800-411-Pain Referral Service, LLC et al v. Tollefson, et al
as 0:2012cv03034
Plaintiff:
1-800-411-Pain Referral Service, LLC , Truman Injury PLLC and Sergio Triana
Defendant:
Ralph Stouffer , Matthew Anderson , Howard Fidler and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2012cv00531
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2012cv00532
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Strobel v. Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company
as 0:2011cv00032
Plaintiff:
Eric Strobel
Defendant:
Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Moore et al v. A.G. Strobel, Inc. et al
as 0:2009cv03539
Plaintiff:
James E. Moore, Tim McGough and James E. Moore
Defendant:
A.G. Strobel, Inc. and Kevin L. Venenga
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
Strobel et al v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
as 0:2009cv02389
Plaintiff:
Dorlores E. Strobel, Dorlores E. Strobel, David E. Strobel and others
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic Puerto Rico, Inc. and Medtronic Puerto Rico Operations Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 -pip-Diversity-Personal Injury, Product Liability
Type:
Other Statutes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
