Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv14357
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Verch v. MH Sub I, LLC
as 2:2026cv10560
Plaintiff:
Marco Verch
Defendant:
MH Sub I, LLC MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands doing business as Internet Brands
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2026cv62584
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2026cv02070
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00331
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv09857
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01376
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01381
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Vesely v. Hamilton Merger Sub II LLC
as 2:2026cv09523
Plaintiff:
Daniel Vesely
Defendant:
Hamilton Merger Sub II LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bennett et al v. IHOP RESTAURANTS, LLC et al
as 0:2026cv62359
Plaintiff:
Margaret Bennett, Stephanie Davis, Carline Hunter and others
Defendant:
IHOP RESTAURANTS, LLC, Sunshine Restaurant Merger Sub, LLC and Brenda Betetchik
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.