Cases 1 - 10 of 3,466
Titus Henderson v. Gary Hamblin, et al
as 24-1757
Plaintiff:
TITUS HENDERSON
Defendant:
GARY HAMBLIN, TIM HAINES, Superintendent, RICHARD S. SCHNEITER and others
Barnes v. Cook County Sheriff Tom Dart et al
as 1:2024cv02214
Plaintiff:
Robbie Barnes
Defendant:
Cook County Sheriff Tom Dart, Superintendent Boutte and Director Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nicholas LaCruze v. Dushan Zatecky, et al
as 23-3078
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NICHOLAS LACRUZE
Defendant / Appellee:
DUSHAN ZATECKY, Superintendent, DUANE ALSIP, JONATHAN JACKSON and others
David Pannell v. Sarah Eads, et al
as 23-2990
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID PANNELL
Defendant / Appellee:
SARAH EADS, KEITH HARTZELL, ROBERT CARTER and others
Bobby Cockerell, III v. Mike Conyers, et al
as 23-2988
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BOBBY B. COCKERELL, III
Defendant / Appellee:
MIKE CONYERS, Major, JERRY GILLEY, Capt, CURTIS BYNUM, Lieutenant, Lt and others
David Pannell v. Sarah Eads, et al
as 23-2972
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID PANNELL
Defendant / Appellee:
SARAH EADS, KEITH HARTZELL, ROBERT CARTER and others
Evans v. White et al
as 3:2023cv00822
Plaintiff:
Robert Evans
Defendant:
B White, Joshua Wallen, Joseph Tackas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lonnial Roundtree, Jr. v. Superintendent Rocco, et al
as 23-2561
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LONNIAL L. ROUNDTREE, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT ROCCO, MS. MITCHELL, JOHN DOE, Director(s) and others
Kevin Johnson v. Martin Purdue, et al
as 23-2478
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEVIN JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
MARTIN PURDUE, EASTER ROSE, Doctor, Psychiartrist, PCF, MS. NORTHCUTT and others
Brisco v. Dart et al
as 1:2023cv04114
Plaintiff:
Steshawn Brisco
Defendant:
Tom Dart, John Does & Jane Does, J. Mueller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
