Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 41 - 50 of 1,414
HARRISON et al v. HARRY et al
as 1:2024cv00070
Plaintiff: PLATINUM HODDIE HARRISON and NIARA BURTON
Defendant: LAUREL R. HARRY and SUPERINTENDENT PATRICIA THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
ROBINSON v. WAHL et al
as 2:2024cv00963
Petitioner: FARUQ ROBINSON
Respondent: SUPERINTENDENT MARK WAHL, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
RICKER v. SCI PINE GROVE et al
as 2:2024cv00273
Petitioner: DAVID EDWARD RICKER
Respondent: SUPERINTENDANT SCI PINE GROVE, PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, SUPERINTENDENT SCI PINE GROVE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
STORY v. S.C.I. PHOENIX MEDICAL DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2024cv00259
Plaintiff: PEARLINA S. STORY
Defendant: S.C.I. PHOENIX MEDICAL DEPARTMENT, ANTHONY LETIZIO, SUPERINTENDENT JOSEPH TERRA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice
MISZLER v. PENNSYLVANIA PAROLE BOARD et al
as 2:2024cv00257
Petitioner: BERNARD MISZLER
Respondent: PENNSYLVANIA PAROLE BOARD, SUPERINTENDENT OF S.C.I. MERCER and PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ROHRBACH v. MCGINLEY et al
as 5:2024cv00911
Petitioner: ROBERT ROHRBACH
Respondent: SUPERINTENDENT THOMAS MCGINLEY, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BERKS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
COOPER v. CALIGURI et al
as 2:2024cv00910
Plaintiff: BENJAMIN COOPER
Defendant: E CALIGURI, WELL PATH/CORRECT CARE, DR BASIL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Novoa v. Superintendent of SCI-Phoenix et al
as 3:2024cv00342
Petitioner: Miguel Figueroa Novoa
Respondent: Superintendent of SCI-Phoenix and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DANIELS v. CLARK
as 2:2024cv00901
Petitioner: CLINTON DANIELS
Respondent: SUPERINTENDENT CLARK, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CASTRO-MOTA v. GALLAGHER et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv00211
Plaintiff: SANTOS CASTRO MOTA and SANTOS CASTRO-MOTA
Defendant: MR. GALLAGHER, CO OFFICER and SUPERINTENDENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?